Categories: Aktualności

Liderzy AI z GM, Zoom i IBM rozważają zalety i wady modeli otwartych i zamkniętych

What Big Companies Are Saying About Open vs. Closed AI

At the recent VB Transform 2025 summit, top minds from General Motors, Zoom, and IBM gathered to tackle a question almost every big company is facing: Should you use open-source AI models you can tweak and see inside, stick with locked-down proprietary solutions, or find a mix of both?

For General Motors, the answer often comes down to safety and following industry rules. They’re building technologies that have to work flawlessly in cars, so controlling how their AI behaves is non-negotiable. GM’s approach is all about staying compliant and keeping risk low—a reflection of the realities in the automotive world.

Zoom takes a different stance. Their focus is on speed and flexibility, especially since their platform needs to adapt to a fast-changing communications landscape. Open models—those that can be customized or built into Zoom’s own tools—fit well here, offering the innovation boost Zoom needs. It’s not just about picking the newest AI for the sake of bragging rights, but figuring out what truly fits their users.

IBM, with its roots deep in regulated sectors like finance and healthcare, leans toward governance and trust. Here, closed models have clear advantages: more control, stricter data handling, and often a more predictable set of behaviors. But IBM’s team doesn’t knock open models entirely—they recognize that open systems offer transparency and allow outside developers to push innovation at a pace closed systems struggle to match. That kind of openness matters, especially when building trust or moving quickly is the goal.

There’s No One-Size-Fits-All Answer

Across the board, all three companies agreed: There’s no single right answer. The choice depends on your customers, your data privacy needs, and the specifics of what you’re building. Sometimes a closed, locked-down approach is safer; other times, the ability to collaborate with a community of developers—or customize the guts of your AI—can give you a sharp competitive edge. In fact, many companies are now creating “hybrid” setups, mixing open and closed elements to get the best of both worlds.

What’s Next?

One big takeaway from the panel is that AI in the enterprise has moved well past the stage of hype. Companies are now rolling out real, production-ready systems—everything from highly specialized small models to broad, agentic systems that can make decisions and carry out tasks autonomously. As business needs change, so will the AI strategies companies choose. The guiding principle? Stay agile, keep an eye on real business goals, and match your tools to your needs—because what works today could change tomorrow as tech moves on.

Read the full article and catch even more insights from the VB Transform 2025 panel on VentureBeat: https://venturebeat.com/ai/open-vs-closed-models-ai-leaders-from-gm-zoom-and-ibm-weigh-trade-offs-for-enterprise-use/

Max Krawiec

This website uses cookies.